Get The FactsGet The Facts Stop The TV Tax with Facebook Stop The TV Tax with Twitter

News

Bloggers and Editorialists React to the TV Tax

The TV Tax issue has been receiving a lot of attention online in the past two weeks. Here is a small selection of articles the broadcasters don’t want you to read.

The Soo News tells readers that the broadcasters are not telling them the whole story:

They claim if rewarded with the fee for carriage, it will ensure local tv remains on the air. Trouble is, local tv stations have been closing across the country well before the current economic crisis. Furthermore, the Networks have not guaranteed the money would be funneled back to local programming. The Cable companies claim the new money will only finance more American TV programs. The staple that has built the Canadian TV networks since the 1960’s.

Source: http://www.soonews.ca/viewblog.php?id=22707

Canadian, Eh! explains that the TV Tax is a money grab by the broadcasters, who have not adapted to the changing business environment:

This fight pertains to whether the cable guys should be paying the networks a fee for broadcasting the basic local television channels. (Or something close to that!). The cable guys charge their consumers a fee for viewing these channels as part of their “Basic” package. Makes sense. They have to get that programming to the consumer using their equipment, and service that equipment when required.
It all boils down to a money grab, in my opinion, on behalf of the networks. With the onset of technology – YouTube, Apple TV, iTunes, etc. – a lot of people have found other ways to view their favourite television programs and movies and subsequently ad revenues have taken a nose dive for the networks. Being a little slow in catching up, the networks have found themselves in a quandary as to how to increase profits and maintain their viability. If this was such a thorn in the side of the networks why didn’t they ask for this fee over 40 years ago when cable was in its infancy??

Source: http://livingincanada.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/the-big-debate-networks-v-cablesatellite/

Blogger Werner Patels argues that instead of asking for a TV Tax, the broadcasters should pay cable and satellite providers for distributing their signals to a larger audience:

Canadian broadcast networks – CBC, CTV, Global and CityTV – would instantly lose at least 70 to 85 percent of their viewers if cable companies were to drop them from the line-up. Or, put differently, the cable-TV companies provide the backbone of the broadcasters’ transmission and distribution infrastructure. Except for the guy sitting directly on top of or underneath a broadcast tower, most Canadians would not be able to see any of their homegrown networks and programming if it were not for the cable companies making them so easily accessible.

Losing basic cable carriage would mean sudden death for all Canadian broadcasters (including the CBC). In fact, the broadcasters should be paying a fee to the cable companies, instead of the other way round, as no Canadian network would be viable without cable.
Source: http://www.wernerpatels.com/2009/10/local-tvs-dirty-little-secret.html

After spending an evening watching CTV, one blogger questions just how important local television really matters to CTV:

I saw one commercial on CTV last Thursday that was basically a full-length music video (well… country music) about how the big cable companies are going to kill local TV ending with the message that we all should support local TV stations and local TV shows. It was quite powerful. Or rather, it would have been had they found a slightly better time to play the ad…

See, they played the ad at 6:57pm. At 6:56pm, at the end of the news, they played their full Thursday night schedule. It looked like this:
7PM – The Vampire Diaries
8PM – CSI
9PM – Grey’s Anatomy
10PM – The Mentalist
11PM – CTV National News
11:30PM – CTV Local News
12:00AM – The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
12:30AM – The Colbert Report

Of those shows, only the local news is, well… local. 30 minutes of their 360 minute prime-time evening is local. 60 minutes are Canadian. The next closest is ‘The Vampire Diaries’ in that one episode was shot in Vancouver (then relocated to Atlanta).

CTV – way to not only say that local TV doesn’t really matter, but also that ‘big cable companies’ are far more entertaining. Kudos.

Source: http://puddingstore.livejournal.com/39489.html

Monte Sonnenberg of the Simcoe Reformer also questions the broadcasters’ sincerity, adding that Ottawa should not accept a TV Tax since it is nothing more than a band-aid solution:

The major broadcasters are being insincere when they say that cable and satellite providers earn enough to absorb any surcharge. Someone needs to tell the broadcasting community that – even though Canadians are avid television watchers – that doesn’t necessarily mean they are stupid. Rest assured – every penny levied as fee for carriage will be passed along in its entirety to subscribers. This is simply how business works, and this is what the bug broadcasters are really proposing. Should Ottawa go for it? No. New media and the increasing fragmentation of the audience is changing the broadcast landscape so quickly that the local station business model is irretrievably broken.

Source: http://www.simcoereformer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2126712

Matermaq.ca shares that sentiment, writing that the TV Tax is:

..not going to solve all of [the broadcasters’] financial troubles. It’s more of a stop-gap solution. They’re still going to lose money and viewers. Isn’t it time to rethink the strategy? Focus energy on something constructive?

Source: http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2009/10/08/local-tv-matters-vs-stop-the-tv-tax/

Finally, Steve Faguy expressed frustration last week with CTV’s coverage of the broadcasters’ news conference, and suggested that CTV owes its viewers an apology:

It doesn’t matter whether you agree with CTV’s campaign, or with fee for carriage, or that local TV is in trouble, or that cable and satellite companies are making too much money. CTV News has a duty to represent a fair picture to its viewers, and it is intentionally failing to do so.
This is what you want us to save?

Source: http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/10/08/ctv-local-tv-press-conference/

  • consumerwhocares
    Here is my question, CTV is asking us to support local television, when the are not supporting local actors, music, producers and so forth by showing any amount on Canadian content other than news programming on there stations. Why should we support them or pay to keep them alive in they are not supporting Canadians. As for Global and CBC, I will give them some credit as they do show some true Canadain content. Question is, why now. These channels having been running for years in the manner they are now.Why all of a sudden are they in trouble. I think they need to entice people to watch their programming not putting something on they can watch on an american station, but by putting more Canadian shows on that people can only see on Canadian TV that they actually want to watch. Shows that are uniquily Canadian. For Example Canadian Idol was a show that many people watched, it highlited local talent, and personally never missed an episode. This year they cut it out of their programming stating that the chose was made due to budget issues. Again if you are not going to support locally, why should we support you.
  • ply
    I think the real issue here is that canwest did some business with corad black and got screwed. now their going bankrupt and trying to get any money they can from the parts of their business that is still viable. Even if a tv tax was to be added to help ctv out there still going to be sold in the long run. We or the cable companies will end up paying money that wont keep them in business anyway. these local stations are going to be sold and lost no matter what happens with this issue and if anything all that would happen is that canwests stock might go up after the sale. Why not wait and see what the new owners of the local stations plan to do for us before we waste any more time with this issue. check out canwest and their bankruptcy proceedings and tell me if you think ctv is going to be there for us either way. I dont think their going to make it regardless.
  • Local tv stations are failing, this is no reason why anyone should pay more to keep them up. We live in a capitalist society, if your product doesnt sell then you fail, you dont make people pay for somthing they dont use or consume. i would rather pay the extra money to increase internet bandwith across the country.
  • bertosa
    When I grew up as a child in the 70's I could remember my father trying to adjust a little antenna on top of our TV hoping to catch a few Canadian local channels (3 or 4 to be exact, and one of them was French). And that's what I still think of Canadian TV to this day! Lets face it , we all know that Canadian TV was something we would watch if we didn't have cable (that is to say if we had no choice).In todays everwhelming choice of American,World TV , Internet etc..does anybody really care for Canadian?? I myself catch about 400 channels!

    My message to Canadian TV has been "Farewell" for the longest time!
blog comments powered by Disqus